Connect with us

affilate software business

Business

Recession Fears Are Receding. That Doesn’t Mean They Were Unfounded.

Published

on


Imagine you are in a car speeding down the road. An obstruction comes into view, and the passengers in the car yell, “Watch out!”

The driver swerves and misses the obstruction, and everything turns out fine.

Were the passengers being alarmist by yelling? Would the driver have averted a crash either way? Was the obstruction big enough to cause damage, or could the car have just driven over it without incident? We’ll never really know. All we know is that things worked out O.K.

The car, in this metaphor, is the United States economy. The drivers are the Federal Reserve and the Trump administration. And the passengers are all the people — especially on Wall Street and in the news media — who were raising recession fears three months ago.

At that time, some unusual swings in the market for United States Treasury bonds stirred a wave of economic pessimism. Three months later, things are looking a great deal better — and the odds of a recession, in the near term at least, appear more remote.

The entire episode has some lessons for understanding the economy, and gives reason for optimism that the expansion, despite being more than a decade old and the longest on record, need not end anytime soon.

The underlying cause of the summer surge in recession fears was a trade war between the United States and China that seemed locked in a hopeless cycle of escalation; a major slump in the European economy; and manufacturing indexes in free fall worldwide.

That made investors so pessimistic about the global economy that they poured money into longer-term securities, pushing their interest rates below short-term rates, known as an inverted yield curve. Because an inverted yield curve has often presaged recessions, this prompted a wave of news coverage that even risked becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy, if businesses and consumers pulled back further.

Three months later, the picture has changed. Longer-term bond yields have risen back to their levels at the start of August: Ten-year Treasury bonds yielded 1.93 percent in Friday morning trading, up from a recent low of 1.46 percent in early September. Longer-term yields are now comfortably above short-term yields, meaning the yield curve is no longer inverted.

And while the manufacturing sector remains in bad shape, the evidence so far points not so much to a free fall as a rough patch. More promising, the troubles in manufacturing have not spread to the services and consumer-focused portions of the economy, which are much larger.

One way of looking at this narrative of the last few months would be to say this proves that everyone was overly jittery, that the news media, Wall Street and the Federal Reserve overreacted to a few inconclusive data points.

That’s not a crazy assertion. Throughout this decade-plus expansion, there have been periodic bursts of pessimistic sentiment, times when a recession seemed to loom, and thus far all of them have proved false. So you could chalk up this episode as one more example, with the lesson being that the American economy is dynamic and robust enough that it will probably keep chugging.

The problem with that narrative is that it omits the circularity involved in economic policy. It was the yield curve inversion and softening of global manufacturing indexes that caught the attention of policymakers, and their moves have helped ease recession fears.

Since midsummer, the Federal Reserve has cut interest rates three times, for a total of 0.75 percent. It was an implicit acknowledgment that interest rate increases in 2018 had pushed rates in the United States beyond what it could handle in light of global deflationary forces.

There were people, both inside and outside the Fed, who argued that these moves were unnecessary in a time of near-full employment, and that they would lead to financial bubbles and other risks down the road. Time will tell whether those warnings are right. And maybe the rate cuts weren’t actually necessary.

But what we do know is that the yield curve is now uninverted. Longer-term yields, while back to their early August levels, are still considerably lower than they were earlier in the year. It’s not that the global economic outlook has improved all that much; it’s just that the Fed has now adjusted United States interest rates to a level that should allow the domestic expansion to continue despite that global slowdown.

Then there is President Trump’s trade policy. It’s clear, both from the timeline of events and comments from the administration, that the recession fears increased the urgency for some form of trade peace with China.

No president wants a recession in an election year, especially not a president who has made boasts about the economy central to his pitch. The basic outlines of the tentative agreement between the world’s two largest economies may have been available all along. China will buy more agricultural products, and the Trump administration will not put in a new round of tariffs that were set to go into effect in December.

There have been mixed signals whether the United States and China will back off from existing tariffs — whether this will amount to de-escalation, or simply to ceasing the escalation. But either way, the tenor of the relationship has improved considerably since August, which is part of why the tenor in markets and surveys of executives is looking better.

As in the economy-as-speeding-car metaphor, we’ll never know for sure whether the risks were as great as the yield curve and some of the more ominous pronouncements from the summer suggested.

What we do know is that the American economy seems to be showing resilience, and it would be better not to find out what happens if the passengers never yell when something gets in the way.



Source

Continue Reading
Partners
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Financial literacy is not the problem – Axios

Published

on

By


Apparently, the first thing that springs to mind when Dimon wants to lend money to black people in Detroit is “philanthropy.” To that end, JPMorgan extended not only credit but educational and informational resources for budding entrepreneurs.

  • A more germane concern for Dimon should be that if his bank wasn’t lending to black Detroiters already, that might be a sign of biased assumptions embedded in JPMorgan’s underwriting processes. After all, Dimon himself says racist assumptions still exist.
  • Stahl asked whether Dimon had observed “a racial bias” when it came to extending loans to African Americans, and Dimon responded yes, he had.

The big picture: There is a long history of racism in U.S. financial services, and that bias manifests itself in many ways, not least the notorious racial wealth gap.

Driving the news: The TIAA Institute quizzed African Americans on financial questions. The National Urban League’s Cy Richardson, introducing the report while extolling his own financial literacy programs, told Axios that “financial illiteracy is particularly acute in communities of color,” that it is “a dangerous epidemic,” and that it is best addressed through what TIAA’s report describes as “increasing efforts to promote financial education in school and the workplace.”

  • Reality check: There’s no evidence that financial education works and quite a lot of evidence that it doesn’t.

My thought bubble: Insofar as financial illiteracy is real, it’s a symptom of poverty much more than a cause of it. Besides, the questions in the TIAA survey do a dreadful job of measuring individuals’ real-world ability to navigate a system that is stacked against them.

Here’s a representative question: According to TIAA, “responses to the following question demonstrate the difficulty many individuals have in comprehending risk.”

  • Investment A will deliver a return of either 10% or 6%, with each outcome equally likely. Investment B will deliver a return of either 12% or 4%, with each outcome equally likely. You can expect to earn more by investing in which?
    • Investment A
    • Investment B
    • It does not matter—expected return is the same with each

Spoiler alert: Just about any answer is reasonable. But according to TIAA, the only correct answer is “it does not matter.” Every other answer, they say, is simply false.

The bottom line: These theoretical questions mostly just measure your ability to turn English-language questions into abstract mathematical models. That kind of skill won’t get you very far when you’re trying to prioritize your credit card, auto loan and mortgage payments to minimize real-world consequences.

  • TIAA, JPMorgan and other giant financial institutions will happily commit high-profile philanthropic dollars on the premise that the poor stay poor because they don’t have enough financial information or education. But as long as communities of color remain cut off from access to non-philanthropic capital, nothing will really change.

Go deeper:



Source

Continue Reading

Business

Cathay Dragon Economy Flight Experience Airbus A320

Published

on



Flying with Cathay Dragon, Cathay Pacific’s regional arm, from Hong Kong to Okinawa, Japan. Find out how the airline lives up to Cathay Pacific’s service!

Thank you for watching this one. Do leave a like, a comment and subscribe! 🙂
Let me know what you think of Cathay Dragon!

Source

Continue Reading

Business

Live impeachment hearing updates: Fiona Hill, David Holmes testimony

Published

on

By


Fiona HillFiona Hill was the top adviser on Russia in the White House until she left the administration over the summer.AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

  • House investigators leading the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump are scheduled to hear from Fiona Hill and David Holmes on Thursday.
  • Hill, the former top Russia adviser on the National Security Council, in closed-door testimony already offered a scathing picture of shadowy efforts to urge Ukraine to investigate Trump’s political rivals.
  • Holmes is a top staffer at the US Embassy in Ukraine and worked closely with Marie Yovanovitch while she was serving as the US ambassador to Ukraine. He overheard a phone call with Trump relevant to the inquiry.
  • They’re scheduled to testify at 9 a.m. ET.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

Fiona Hill, the former director for Europe and Russia on the National Security Council, and David Holmes, a top staffer at the US Embassy in Ukraine, are set to testify before House investigators Thursday for the public impeachment hearings into President Donald Trump.

The hearing will be broadcast on C-SPAN and the major cable news networks. Insider will also embed a livestream of the hearings here when they kick off.

Watch the hearing here:

 


LIVE: Fiona Hill and David Holmes to testify in Thursday’s impeachment hearing

House investigators leading the impeachment…

LIVE: Fiona Hill and David Holmes to testify in Thursday’s impeachment hearing

Fiona Hill,Impeachment inquiry,Trump impeachment,Ukraine,Russia,John Bolton,Donald Trump,Impeachment,Joe Biden,David Holmes,Features

LIVE: Fiona Hill and David Holmes to testify in Thursday’s impeachment hearing

2019-11-21T15:00:00+01:00

2019-11-20T17:41:42+01:00

2019-11-21T15:05:27+01:00

https://headsn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/1574362554_919_Live-impeachment-hearing-updates-Fiona-Hill-David-Holmes-testimony.jpg

BusinessInsiderDe



House investigators leading the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump are scheduled to hear from Fiona Hill and David Holmes on Thursday.
Hill, the former top Russia adviser on the National Security Council, in closed-door testimony already offered a scathing picture of shadowy efforts to urge Ukraine to investigate Trump’s political rivals.
Holmes is a top staffer at the US Embassy in Ukraine and worked closely with Marie Yovanovitch while she was serving as the US ambassador to Ukraine. He overheard a phone call with Trump relevant to the inquiry.
They’re scheduled to testify at 9 a.m. ET.
Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

Fiona Hill, the former director for Europe and Russia on the National Security Council, and David Holmes, a top staffer at the US Embassy in Ukraine, are set to testify before House investigators Thursday for the public impeachment hearings into President Donald Trump.
The hearing will be broadcast on C-SPAN and the major cable news networks. Insider will also embed a livestream of the hearings here when they kick off.
Watch the hearing here:
Youtube Embed: //www.youtube.com/embed/MpTIb_HubrY Width: 560px Height: 315px
 

Read more of Insider’s impeachment coverage:
Think Trump will get impeached? Gambling sites say the odds are in your favor
Trump could be impeached and removed from office but still win reelection in 2020
Over half of the House members support the impeachment inquiry against Trump — see all of them here
Everything you need to know about Trump’s impeachment process: What’s happened, who the players are, and what comes next

international

LIVE: Fiona Hill and David Holmes to testify in Thursday’s impeachment hearing

House investigators leading the impeachment…

LIVE: Fiona Hill and David Holmes to testify in Thursday’s impeachment hearing

Fiona Hill,Impeachment inquiry,Trump impeachment,Ukraine,Russia,John Bolton,Donald Trump,Impeachment,Joe Biden,David Holmes,Features

LIVE: Fiona Hill and David Holmes to testify in Thursday’s impeachment hearing

2019-11-21T15:00:00+01:00

2019-11-21T15:05:27+01:00

https://headsn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/1574362554_919_Live-impeachment-hearing-updates-Fiona-Hill-David-Holmes-testimony.jpg

BusinessInsiderDe



House investigators leading the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump are scheduled to hear from Fiona Hill and David Holmes on Thursday.
Hill, the former top Russia adviser on the National Security Council, in closed-door testimony already offered a scathing picture of shadowy efforts to urge Ukraine to investigate Trump’s political rivals.
Holmes is a top staffer at the US Embassy in Ukraine and worked closely with Marie Yovanovitch while she was serving as the US ambassador to Ukraine. He overheard a phone call with Trump relevant to the inquiry.
They’re scheduled to testify at 9 a.m. ET.
Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

Fiona Hill, the former director for Europe and Russia on the National Security Council, and David Holmes, a top staffer at the US Embassy in Ukraine, are set to testify before House investigators Thursday for the public impeachment hearings into President Donald Trump.
The hearing will be broadcast on C-SPAN and the major cable news networks. Insider will also embed a livestream of the hearings here when they kick off.
Watch the hearing here:
Youtube Embed: //www.youtube.com/embed/MpTIb_HubrY Width: 560px Height: 315px
 

Read more of Insider’s impeachment coverage:
Think Trump will get impeached? Gambling sites say the odds are in your favor
Trump could be impeached and removed from office but still win reelection in 2020
Over half of the House members support the impeachment inquiry against Trump — see all of them here
Everything you need to know about Trump’s impeachment process: What’s happened, who the players are, and what comes next

international



Source

Continue Reading

Trending

We use cookies to best represent our site. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the use of cookies.
Yes